How can we help?
Straight answers about intent enforcement, where ArmorIQ fits in your stack, and how it differs from IAM and guardrails.
Questions security leaders ask.
Intent is the job description for your AI agent. If a user asks an agent to summarize my emails, the intent is email summarization, not accessing your calendar, not sending messages, not reading billing data. ArmorIQ enforces that boundary.
IAM controls who can access a resource. ArmorIQ controls what an agent does once it has access. An agent might have permission to read customer data, but should it read billing data when it was only asked for the customer's name? IAM says yes. ArmorIQ says no.
The action doesn't execute. The agent receives a clear explanation: 'Action blocked: exceeds delegated authority.' An audit log is created with full context. Your security team gets notified if you've configured alerts.
ArmorIQ sits between AI reasoning and execution. Agents plan and adapt freely, but before any action runs, ArmorIQ checks that it aligns with the approved task. It complements existing IAM, Zero Trust, and monitoring, it doesn't replace them.
Security teams, platform engineers, and compliance officers at companies running AI agents in production. If your agents can access data, call APIs, or trigger workflows autonomously, you need intent enforcement.
ArmorClaw, our intent assurance for OpenClaw agents, is open source with cryptographic verification at every step. The full ArmorIQ control fabric is a commercial product with self-hosted and cloud deployment options.
Talk to the team. Book a demo and we’ll walk you through it.
Ready to control what your AI agents actually do?
Join the teams shipping safer, compliant AI agent deployments. White-glove onboarding for the first 50 design partners.